Initiative targets key pollution sources in Lake Champlain Watershed, including agriculture and wastewater, to prevent harmful algal blooms
By Zachary Matson
A new plan for New York’s side of the Lake Champlain watershed will guide state funding for years under a two-state attempt to control phosphorus pollution in the nation’s 13th largest lake.
The state Department of Environmental Conservation on Monday released its final Lake Champlain Watershed Implementation Plan, which details current pollution sources and programs aimed at controlling them.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
The plan lists specific projects to prioritize, including grants to improve agriculture practices, dredge sediment, restore streamside buffers and replace undersized culverts. The plan encompasses projects in the Lake George watershed, which ultimately feeds Lake Champlain.
The plan offers the state’s most up-to-date assessment of conditions on Lake Champlain and the key pollution sources driving the growth of harmful algal blooms, fueling excessive plant growth and reducing water clarity. DEC released a draft last year and incorporated public input into the final version.
A 2002 federal pollution control plan mandates certain phosphorus targets for the eastern and western sides of the lake, with a larger allotment accounting for the larger area and higher density of agriculture and development on the Vermont side. New York has met the targets in some tributaries, but neither state has managed to keep phosphorus levels below thresholds outlined to achieve water quality goals.
In New York’s heavily-forested watershed, about 90% forest cover, roadside erosion, overused trails, poorly managed dirt and logging roads and land development contribute to phosphorus pollution, according to the plan. Agriculture is also a key contributor of phosphorus.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
Urban runoff contributes the most phosphorus per acre of any source but makes up a small share of New York’s watershed.
Wastewater treatment plants were identified as a major phosphorus source to control in the 2002 federal plan, and in New York those facilities are contributing around half the phosphorus load they were allocated under that plan.
Standing on the breezy shore of Lake Champlain at Ausable Point campground, DEC Commissioner Basil Seggos on Monday championed the new plan and progress the state has made in supporting water quality improvement.
Seggos highlighted a recent $1 million grant to the Peru wastewater treatment plant as the type of state investment that has helped control phosphorus pollution around Lake Champlain.
The Adirondack Explorer thanks its advertising partners. Become one of them.
Seggos, who in February announced plans to step down from the position, said New York continues to invest in programs to improve water infrastructure and protect water quality.
He said the new Lake Champlain plan will guide how future investments are targeted around the important lake.
“You have to do everything you can to protect this body of water, safeguard it for generations to come,” Seggos said. “This is a moment of renaissance for water quality and environmental investment.”
Water quality updates
Sign up for the “Water Line” newsletter, with weekly updates about pollution, climate change and development’s impacts on the Adirondacks’ lakes, rivers and streams.
Peter Brownsey says
Zachary,
The Hudson Champlain Express Power Line is going to put electric power cables the entire length of Lake Champlain.
Has there been an environmental review of this project? How will this affect the water quality in Lake Champlain?
Peter
Douglas Seamon says
“In New York’s heavily-forested watershed, about 90% forest cover, … and logging roads”
Where is this on the roughly 121 mile shore line zone of Lake Champlain?
Two issues:
Farms spreading Manure in the field while the ground is frozen and run off from this in the spring and fall. Please explain implementation to stop this?
Burlington Vermont pollution run. How is New York handling a Vermont problem?
Frank ( Joe) Lattimore says
Our State has spent well over $300 million dollars in the last 10yrs with no results on stopping soil and nutrient losses into our waterbodies.
Biochar production from animal and human waste
will correct our watershed problems now and into the future. The monies above should have been used to build gasification and pyrolysis facilities producing soil enhancing biochar.
Knowing you have a problem and not fixing it is shameful.
Lee says
Zachary,
Why are you not writing about how it is that nobody has pursued whether the two cables of the Champlain Hudson Power Express being installed in a significant portion of Lake Champlain does not violate the Forever Wild Clause of the New York Constitution, meant to protect aquatic life and watershed ecological balance within ADK Park?
Nina Nichols says
The CHPE project should not move forward. It is terrible for the ecosystem and everyone who drinks from the Hudson River.