Madshus Epoch backcountry skis

One day in early April, when the temperature climbed into the forties, people were walking around Saranac Lake in T-shirts, dreaming of summer. It was perfect weather for testing a new pair of skis.

Sue Bibeau, the designer for the Adirondack Explorer, and I did a round trip to Klondike Notch in the High Peaks Wilderness, a little-used trail that starts at the end of South Meadow Road and ends near Johns Brook Lodge.

I was trying out my Madshus Epochs, a waxless ski designed for backcountry touring. The Epochs have metal edges and are wide enough to provide stability for quick turns on downhills, though they’re not as beefy as most telemark skis.

The Madshus line of bacountry skis includes the Annums (top), Epochs (middle), and Eons.
The Madshus line of bacountry skis includes the Annums (top), Epochs (middle), and Eons.

The Epochs weigh 5 pounds 9 ounces. In comparison, Black Diamond Havocs (which I also own) weigh 8 pounds 6 ounces. The Epochs’ lightness makes them a good all-round ski, ideal for tours that involve flats and rolling terrain as well as substantial downhill runs. A lightweight telemark boot is a good match.

Coincidentally, Sue was using essentially the same ski: Tenth Mountain Divisions made by Karhu, which is no longer in the ski business. The Tenth Mountains were in Karhu’s popular “XC Downhill” line of skis. The line’s four models, from narrowest to widest, were the Pinnacles, GTs (for “general touring”), Tenth Mountains, and Guides.

In 2010, Madshus took over the XC Downhhill line. It dropped the Pinnacle but still manufactures the other three under different names (the GT is now the Eon, and the Guide is now the Annum).

Sue has owned her Tenth Mountain Divisions for a few years and loves them. She has taken them up Mount Marcy, Algonquin Peak, and Wright Peak, among other places. She says the skis are not ideal for the steepest terrain in the High Peaks, but they do work. If you plan to ski a lot of steep terrain, the wider Annums are a better choice.

I wouldn’t mind trying the Epochs on Marcy if conditions were right (light powder), but I’d be more comfortable on the difficult pitches on heavier skis, my Havocs or Karhu Jaks. Given that much of the 7.5-mile trail up Marcy is fairly mellow, I can see the appeal of going light. In fact, many people do ski Marcy with light skis and leather boots.

Because they’re waxless, the Epochs are a good choice for spring skiing (as are the Eons and Annums). Hard waxes do not work when the temperatures rise above freezing, so those with waxable skis must resort to klister or kicker skins to grip the snow while climbing or kicking and gliding.

I used klister only once, years ago. It was such a gloppy mess that I haven’t used it since. It’s like melted bubble gum, sticking to everything it touches, including fingers and clothing. I later bought a pair of kicker skins, but I don’t use them much. Kicker skins attach to the ski’s kick zone. The nylon nap grips the snow, sort of like wax. The problem I have found is that the metal piece at the front of the skins often digs into the snow, inhibiting glide.

With waxless skis, you don’t have to fuss with klister or kicker skins. But waxless skis have their limitations. If climbing a lot of steep terrain, you should bring a pair of full-length skins–just as you would with waxable skis. Or be prepared to herringbone or side-step.

On our ascent of Klondike Notch, Sue and I gained more than a thousand feet of elevation. Since most of the trail is mellow, the scales on our skis usually provided sufficient grip. In a number of places, we did resort to herringboning or side-stepping, but these pitches were short. Skins would have been overkill and would have slowed our progress on the flats and small dips we encountered en route to the notch.

All in all, we had the right equipment for the job.

Click hereto see a video of Ron Konowitz demonstrating the Karhu Guides (now Annums) on the Marcy Dam trail.

About Phil Brown

Phil Brown edited the Adirondack Explorer from 1999 until his retirement in 2018. He continues to explore the park and to write for the publication and website.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Pete Nye says

    Hey:
    useful review of these skis; sound good.
    I have a very old pair of waxless :Bushwhackers”, with cable that I have outgrown. My question:
    I’m looking for a cable-type waxless ski, mostly the binding for one I guess, that would accomodate my regular winter boot that I wear for snowshoes/winter treks, rather than having to buy special boots for the back-country skis and then change them out to move to the snowshoes when summiting. It would be great to have bindings capable of allowing my regular winter boots. Thoughts ?

    • Phil Brown says

      Hi, Pete. I believe there are a few bindings that allow this, but I have no experience with them. My guess is that they would not be very secure. If you do a google search for “Ski bindings for hiking boots” you’ll find a few discussions. One of the articles that comes up is from Outside Magazine. That writer warns against using hiking boots for skiing and sugggests finding a ski boot that you are comfortable hiking in. But you’ll find other articles by people who have tried what you’re thinking of. You can always use an AT setup (if you don’t mind hiking in plastic boots), but that is expensive solution. Sorry I can’t be of more help.

      • Pete Nye says

        thanks Phil: kind of what I thought. Guess I’ll have to keep thinking/looking/trying ! See you out there (assuming we get some snow !)
        Pete

  2. Carroll Matusiak says

    I saw a lot of website but I think this one has got something special in it. “Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.” by H. G. Wells.

  3. fszaba says

    I also have this ski (Karhu 10th Mountain) and find that the idewal boot to drive it is the Fischer BCX-675, paired with the Voile 75mm 3-pin bindings with removable cable. It is a lightweight, full coverage, semi-rigid boot. It provides generous ankle flex when walking, has good lateral rigidity for control, and a sole that is darn near impossible to torsionally twist. They are more comfortable than my hiking boots for walking long miles, easily fit into my MSR ascent snowshoes, and securely connect to the BD Sabertooth Pro mountaineering crampon.
    I really cannot imagine a combination of gear that is more ideal for fast, efficient, and competent movement through Adirondack winter terrain.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Your monthly donation now will support Adirondack journalism year round.

Wait, before you go,

sign up for news updates from the Adirondack Explorer!