2 Responses

  1. Paul says:

    Isn’t proposal 4 also one that will not really substantially benefit the public? It looks like it is mainly to give the private owners clean title to land that the state thinks it might own (and isn’t most of it waterfront land)? Is the land being exchanged also valuable waterfront property?

  2. Sharon says:

    IMO a shame. Opening up a can of worms I think. Not to mention the effect the expansion will have on the wildlife and the water since it is waterfront property they will be mining. I hope DEC says no, no offense to business expansion/preservation but we are seeing now what we did a century ago and paying for it now for alot of things we really don’t need excess of. All for what ceramic cups, paint and tile? lol

Leave a Reply