 |
Photo by Pat Hendrick |
| Richard Earle, at far right in photo,
leads his friends on a ride in the northern Adirondacks. Earle,
president of a local ATV club, argues that owners of off-road
vehicles should be given more access to the Forest Preserve. |
Do ATVs belong in Preserve?
Riders seek access, but foes cite abuses
By Phil Brown
Meet Richard Earle: Ph.D., retired McGill University
professor, Bluebird Society volunteer, fan of the novelist Wallace
Stegner and avid rider of all-terrain vehicles.
If the last item surprises you, Earle says,
you may be stereotyping ATV riders. “A lot of people think
we’re drunken yahoos, but that’s simply not so,”
remarked Earle, a resident of Mountain View on the northern edge
of the Adirondack Park. “This is a family sport.”
As president of Franklin All-Terrain Riders,
Earle has emerged as an articulate defender of ATVs at a time when
environmental groups are seeking to curtail or even ban four-wheelers
in the public Forest Preserve.
Like other enthusiasts, Earle argues that
more, not less, of the state land in the Adirondacks should be open
to ATVs. “There are [nearly] 3 million acres in the Forest
Preserve and a significant number of people who own and ride ATVs—nearly
100,000 in New York state,” he said. “It seems as though
some reasonable access would make sense.”
The future of ATVs in the Park could be decided
over the next few years as the state Department of Environmental
Conservation prepares unit management plans (UMPs) for the various
tracts of state land. The plans will determine where, if anywhere,
ATVs will be allowed in the Preserve.
At UMP meetings in the Park, four-wheelers
have turned out in force to demand greater access to state land.
The New York State Off-Highway Recreational Vehicle Association
(NYSORVA) tracks the progress of individual plans on its Web site
and informs its members how to get involved: “We can stop
the opposition from winning again and again by participating in
the UMP process, advising our politicians that [off-road vehicle]
enthusiasts have been shut out of state lands for too long, and
standing up for our rights as residents and taxpayers.”
Preservationists, however, are adamant in
their opposition to opening more of the Preserve to ATVs, citing
the damage to plants and soils caused by the machines and the frequent
instances of trespass. Two citizen groups—the Adirondack Council
and the Residents’ Committee to Protect the Adirondacks—contend
that ATV abuse has gotten so out of hand that four-wheelers should
be banned entirely from the Forest Preserve.
 |
Photo courtesy of
Residents’ Committee to Protect the Adirondacks |
Muddy ruts on a trail
in Black River Wild Forest. |
“In just about every place where legal
access [to state land] is provided there is illegal incursion into
the adjacent Forest Preserve,” said John Sheehan, a spokesman
for the council.
Peter Bauer, head of the Residents’
Committee, pointed to ATV ads with slogans such as “Addicted
to mud” and “The road to heaven is paved with mud”
as evidence that four-wheelers have no place in the “forever
wild” Preserve. “These are vehicles that destroy the
ground on which they ride,” he said. “That’s part
of the fun; that’s part of the excitement.”
People on both sides of the debate say DEC
has yet to come to grips with the ATV boom. Over the past decade,
the number of ATVs registered in the state more than tripled. In
just one year, from 2000 to 2001, registrations shot up from 69,500
to 98,655. In addition, there are 200,000 unregistered ATVs in the
state, according to one estimate. More than 22,000 ATVs are registered
in the counties lying wholly or partially within the Park.
Currently, ATV riders have little legal access
to the Forest Preserve. No motor vehicles of any kind are allowed
in Wilderness Areas, which account for 1.1 million of the Park’s
6 million acres. In Wild Forest Areas, which encompass 1.3 million
acres, four-wheelers can travel only on existing public roads (usually
unpaved) that are designated as open to ATVs. They are not allowed
on any trails. Nearly all the Park’s private land is also
off-limits to ATVs.
DEC’s policy toward ATVs borders on
the schizophrenic. The agency’s Region 5, which oversees the
eastern two-thirds of the Park, has not opened a single road to
ATV riders (except for disabled individuals). Region 6, which has
jurisdiction over the rest of the Park, allows ATVs on about 50
roads, but many four-wheelers are unaware of which roads they can
ride on, and DEC does not go out of its way to inform them. While
researching this story, the Explorer filed a Freedom of
Information request for a list of the ATV roads. The agency refused
to comply, but an administrative law judge turned over the list
on appeal. The whole process took seven months.
With so many riders and so few places to ride
legally, ATV trespass has become commonplace. The Residents’
Committee and the Association for the Protection of the Adirondacks
have taken numerous photographs of trails around the Park that have
been ravaged by ATVs, with the worst sections churned into muddy
swales.
CONFLICTED AND CONFUSED
Bauer argues that DEC’s failure to articulate a “clear
and coherent” policy on ATVs has fostered trespass. He said
many four-wheelers who visit the Adirondacks either don’t
know it’s illegal to ride on most of the Preserve or can’t
find legal trails—and so they break the law. “We should
not have conflicting policies for the Forest Preserve,” he
said.
Sheehan, the Adirondack Council spokesman,
suspects that the policies reflect the attitudes of the two regional
directors, Stuart Buchanan of Region 5 and Sandra LeBarron of Region
6. “Stu Buchanan has been very responsive to complaints and
seems genuinely interested in preventing ATV abuse,” he said.
“Sandy LeBarron has not.” He added that “the very
lax law enforcement in Region 6 has allowed illegal abuse to proliferate.”
But Rob Davies, director of DEC’s Division
of Lands and Forests, said the policy split developed long before
LeBarron took over as regional director in 1999. He ascribes it
to a motorized tradition in the Park’s western region, where
the gentle terrain allowed people to build roads deep into the woods.
Historically, hunters, trappers and fishermen drove cars and trucks
on these roads to approach their favorite hunting grounds or ponds.
ATV use is seen as an outgrowth of this reliance on motor vehicles.
Davies concedes that DEC officials, like most
people, failed to foresee the swift rise in the popularity of ATVs.
He said the agency now recognizes the need to develop a consistent
ATV policy for the Park and expects to issue such a policy in early
2004. Although DEC is not advocating a ban, he said, it plans to
develop stricter criteria for determining when it is appropriate
to open a road to ATVs.
Critics question whether Region 6 followed
the law in opening roads to ATVs—which they allege was often
done without public input or a thorough environmental review. In
addition, they contend that some of the “roads” are
really trails and so should be off-limits to ATVs. The Park’s
State Land Master Plan defines a road as “an improved or partially
improved way designed for travel by automobiles.” The argument
is that ordinary automobiles could not travel over many of the dirt
roads open to ATVs.
“What’s a road? What’s
a trail? That’s what we’re trying to get DEC to differentiate,”
said David Gibson, executive director of the Association for the
Protection of the Adirondacks.
Davies said nearly all the ATV roads were
so designated in UMPs. Therefore, the public had a chance to speak
out both at DEC hearings and at APA meetings. Furthermore, the APA
commissioners reviewed and approved all the UMPs. “It isn’t
as though this was being done in secret,” he remarked.
Nevertheless, Davies said DEC plans to take
another look at the roads to see if any should be closed to ATVs.
In fact, the agency already has closed some roads that sustained
heavy damage from the vehicles.
Not all environmentalists are calling for
an all-out ATV ban. Gibson and Neil Woodworth, lawyer for the Adirondack
Mountain Club (ADK), said some Forest Preserve roads may be suitable
for four-wheelers, but both want to see a curtailment of legal access
and a crackdown on trespassers. Woodworth advocates immediate closure
of any road that shows signs of environmental degradation or trespass
into adjacent lands.
ATVers argue that until riders have more trails
where they can go legally, trespass is inevitable. “If they
created a trail network, there’d be no reason to go out and
tear up other places,” said Herb Robinson, 73, president of
the Black River Valley 4-Wheelers, who lives just inside the Park
near its western border.
 |
Courtesy of Isaak Walton
League |
| Critics complain that ads encourage ATV
riders to run roughshod over the environment. According to Yamaha,
“The Road to heaven is paved in mud.” |
Ideally, the network would enable them to travel
in loops at least 25 miles long—not just on roads, but also
on forest trails. “Woods are pretty,” Robinson said.
“If I want to ride the roads, I can do it in my truck.”
Although such a network probably would utilize
private and municipal lands as well, riders would like to see trails
cut through the Preserve where necessary. They also argue that if
the state Legislature revives an ATV trail fund, using a portion
of their registration fees, the trails could be designed and maintained
to minimize environmental damage.
Yet the construction of ATV trails in the
Preserve would necessitate amending the State Land Master Plan in
the face of fierce opposition from environmentalists. It’s
a battle that Alex Ernst, spokesman for NYSORVA, the off-road lobby,
concedes cannot be won. “We advocate access where it is appropriate
and possible under the rules and laws of the state,” he said.
In fact, Ernst thinks it’s just a matter
of time before the state closes more and perhaps all roads in the
Preserve to ATVs. Although he will continue to fight for use of
the roads, he intends to shift his focus to easement properties—private
timberlands where the state owns recreational rights. Such properties
are not governed by the State Land Master Plan.
The state now holds easements on 162,000 acres
in the Adirondacks, including 129,000 acres protected in the Champion
International deal of 1998. Ernst wants to see an ATV network on
the former Champion lands that would utilize existing gravel roads
but also include hardened trails built for ATVs.
WHERE CAN THEY GO?
The Forestland Group, which manages these lands, is negotiating
with DEC over ATV access, according to Matt Sampson, the company’s
Northeast regional manager. The property has more than 160 miles
of roads, he said, but not all of them will be open to ATVs.
“We own property all over the
country, and ATVs are a problem on every piece of property we own,”
Sampson said. The problems include trespass, environmental damage
and liability risks. Nevertheless, he stressed that the company
welcomes ATVs “as long as there is proper oversight.”
Environmentalists are divided over the use
of ATVs on easement lands. Sheehan said the Adirondack Council would
not oppose the creation of ATV trails. “There is some room
on easement property for that sort of recreation,” he said,
“and it might take pressure off the Forest Preserve.”
Bauer said he would not object to four-wheelers riding on existing
roads, but he opposes building ATV trails, which he says would harm
the environment.
Woodworth, the ADK lawyer, does not want ATVs
on easement lands at all. Noting the state owns several rivers that
flow through the former Champion properties, he said ATVers would
be tempted to cross Forest Preserve to reach the water. “The
track record of ATV owners is terrible,” he said. “I
don’t trust them to stay on the easement lands.”
Ernst points to the Allegheny National Forest
in Pennsylvania as a model for the easement lands. There, the Forest
Service has opened 108 miles of trails to off-road vehicles. Because
the trails are hardened and well-maintained, Ernst said, environmental
damage is kept to a minimum. And because the network is so extensive,
he added, riders do not go off the trails.
The Forest Service, which spends $300,000
a year to manage the trails, estimates that riders contribute $17
million to the local economy. Ernst said an ATV trail network would
provide a similar financial boost to the Adirondacks. “When
people pursue this pastime,” he said, “they spend money
on gas, food and lodging in the area they go to.” If promoted,
he said, ATVing could become a bigger boon than snowmobiling, which
is limited to winter.
George Canon, president of the Adirondack
Association of Towns and Villages, believes most municipal officials
in the Park favor more opportunities for ATV riding in the Forest
Preserve and on private land—and not just because of the tourist
dollars. “There’s also an issue of fairness,”
he said. “This is a recreational use that people are enjoying,
so why not?”
SPITZER SUES TO STOP ATVS
Many towns in the Park have opened municipal roads to ATVs—a
practice that environmentalists say contributes to trespassing since
the roads often border Forest Preserve lands. In Horicon, the Town
Board even passed a law this year opening old dirt roads within
the Preserve to ATVs, arguing that they were historically town roads.
One is in the Pharaoh Lake Wilderness; seven are in the Lake George
Wild Forest. “People have been using them as ATV trails since
there were ATVs,” said Horicon Supervisor Ralph Bentley. He
contends that a 1909 state law gives the town perpetual jurisdiction
over the roads.
New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer has
sued the town on DEC’s behalf, arguing that Horicon’s
new law violates the forever-wild clause of the state constitution,
which protects the Forest Preserve, and the Park’s State Land
Master Plan. The suit is pending.
DEC has tried to rein in ATV abuse in recent
years. Besides closing some roads, the agency has stepped up enforcement.
On one Sunday last summer, DEC officials ticketed 25 people who
drove ATVs onto the Forest Preserve east of Lake George. But with
millions of acres of Forest Preserve in the Adirondacks, DEC would
be hard-pressed to eradicate ATV trespass. Environmental activists
say it would help if the state Legislature adopted tougher penalties
for violators, including the confiscation of vehicles after a second
or third offense.
Ernst, however, warns that a crackdown will
not put an end to trespassing, not when there are 100,000 to 300,000
ATV owners in the state desperate for places to ride.
“People aren’t interested
in giving us access if we’re breaking the rules,” he
said, “but we can’t stop people from doing the wrong
thing if it’s impossible for them to do the right thing. I’m
very sorry to say the problems will continue to get worse as ATV
use increases.” |